A really interesting day today was. It started when I, as always, not managed, what I had intended: instead of 9 clock get up and go shopping, I stayed until quarter 12 are, then go directly to the university.
Japanese ran slowly, I have a feeling that Mr. Kiyonaga now takes more time to really explain, also brings Julie often naughty jokes, to laugh heartily at the ale. Excited I also noted that Sandra just as I had not mentioned in the e-learning system, ergo not complete the online homework. We carried the problem of demand before Mr. Kiyonaga, who said only that he had no idea the technology it, we should contact the system administrator (who we previously sent to Mr. Kiyonaga ...). Well, let's see what that is.
After that I rushed to the BA-working group meeting with Mr. Malovice. I met in the hallway outside his office on the other three who write to him at work (a total of 8 people write in the field of political theory ... wow) and we exchanged a little about the traps that the BA in general and the technical system of the university in particular has so ready.
asked us little late Mr Malovice then in his office, served us coffee and sweets and listened intently to our conversation about the inability of some didactic tutors and the perceived futility of the teaching module as a whole.
Talking about the BA work itself was quite enjoyable, it gave us courage, that all others who are writing a work (eg PhD students), only cook with water and that we can do it. He showed us several short books that should help a writing final papers and then took us in different essay databases. The quoting of current scientific papers be something, when his reference, which would in the assessment of BA-work notice very positive and the score could increase again slightly.
The meeting lasted about an hour, then we were released and went off together to the Political Theory Colloquium, where doctoral students, master's, diploma, bachelor Staatsexamler and we were all united. One of the lecturers, Mr Michael was now so turn to present his thesis - and I was looking forward to the water with which he would cook.
This water was really impressive, because I need ine while before I understood what he was talking and what he wanted. This had me very discouraged, as it obviously was not water that he used for cooking, but at least the second part of his presentation, I understand. I could even follow the subsequent discussion, as opposed to my other colleagues in BA, but I found that I could not quote off the cuff s wanted Thatcher, Locke or Kant. The knowledge that the others have on it is huge, I admire them for it and I admit I let them intimidate me something. Of course, now are Mr. and Mr. Michael Malovice older and have graduated long ago and, above all, Professor Bluhm is naturally well-read - however, I respect.
My complex is not better, then when I get mail from hastuzeit colleagues who want to write an article about a 18 year old graduate engineer who is now teaching at the MLU ( * click * ). Here comes one then seeeeeeeehr but still small ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment